Brownsburg Police Address Public Concerns Over Flock Camera System

 Brownsburg, IN — Questions about Brownsburg's use of Flock license plate reader cameras took center stage during the Town Council's most recent meeting as officials responded to concerns from a resident regarding privacy, surveillance, and how the camera system is funded.

The discussion began during public comment when a resident asked town officials to explain the purpose of the cameras and how they are paid for. The resident said concerns over surveillance and data collection prompted them to research the technology after noticing cameras installed throughout Brownsburg.

In response, Brownsburg Police Chief Joe Grimes said the department currently operates 16 Flock license plate reader cameras located along major roadways throughout town.

Grimes told the council the cameras are not used to actively monitor residents and are only accessed as part of criminal investigations after a crime has been reported. He also addressed common misconceptions about the technology, explaining that the cameras do not record audio or capture facial images, but instead are limited to reading license plates and providing vehicle information that can assist investigators.

According to Grimes, the department initially purchased the camera system using police forfeiture funds. Ongoing costs are now covered through Local Income Public Safety Tax (LIT) revenue rather than the town's general fund.

Police officials also highlighted several investigations where the system has proven valuable. Grimes said the cameras have helped investigators quickly identify suspects in violent crimes, recover stolen vehicles, and assisted in solving the 2024 homicide at Williams Park Dog Park within approximately 24 hours.

Town officials emphasized that the purpose of the system is to generate investigative leads rather than track the day-to-day movements of residents.

The discussion comes as Flock license plate reader cameras continue to generate debate in communities across Indiana and the United States. Supporters argue the technology has become an effective tool for solving crimes and locating stolen vehicles, while opponents have raised concerns over privacy, government surveillance, and the collection of vehicle travel data.